AGNOSTIC Papers

AgPa #23: Trading on the Weather

Global weather-based trading strategies (2022)
Ming Dong, Andréanne Tremblay
Journal of Banking & Finance, Volume 143, 106558, URL/SSRN

People tend to be in a better mood when the sun is shining. That’s nothing dramatically new but this week’s AGNOSTIC Paper shows that this apparently also applies to investors. An investment strategy that went long (short) the stock market index from the country with the best (worst) weather on a particular day generated meaningful (hypothetical) outperformance…

  • The global long-short weather strategy returned 15.2% p.a. between 1993 and 2012
  • The long-only version of the strategy returned 13.4% p.a.

Read the Full Post

AgPa #22: Gamification of Trading

Does Gamified Trading Stimulate Risk Taking? (2021)
Philipp Chapkovski, Mariana Khapko, Marius Zoican
Swedish House of Finance Research Paper No. 21-25 via SSRN

Online brokers (Robinhood & Co.) are without question important financial innovations. They offer de-facto free trading and save investors a lot of fees. But they also leverage technology to encourage people to do more transactions. An important part of this is gamification and this week’s AGNOSTIC Paper examines that issue with a pretty cool experiment…

  • Gamification encourages investors to take more risk
  • Inexperienced investors without financial knowledge are most vulnerable

Read the Full Post

AgPa #21: AI-Powered vs. Human Funds

Do AI-Powered Mutual Funds Perform Better? (2022)
Rui Chen, Jinjuan Ren
Finance Research Letters, Volume 47, Part A, URL/SSRN

This week’s AGNOSTIC Paper compares the performance of AI-powered- and human mutual funds between 2017 and 2019 in the US. Although AI-powered funds are not the holy grail some investors may have hoped for, they still added value compared to their human peers…

  • AI-powered mutual funds did not outperform the US market
  • But AI-powered funds outperformed their human peers
  • And AI-powered funds avoided the disposition- and rank effect

Read the Full Post

AgPa #20: Performance of ESG Exclusions

The Expected Returns of ESG Excluded Stocks. The Case of Exclusions from Norway’s Oil Fund (2022)
Erika Berle, Wanwei (Angela) He, Bernt Arne Ødegaard
SSRN Working Paper, URL

This week’s AGNOSTIC Paper examines the ESG exclusions of a popular investor: the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund, also known as the “oil fund”. Between 2005 and 2021, the fund excluded 189 companies that engage in different types of “bad” practices or products. These exclusions are interesting because they reveal insights about the impact of ESG for a large real-world institutional investor…

  • ESG-excluded stocks generated up to 6.85% alpha per year
  • There seems to be a return premium on “bad” stocks

Read the Full Post

AgPa #19: ESG Confusion (2/2)

Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings (2022)
Florian Berg, Julian F. Kölbel, Roberto Rigobon
Review of Finance, Corrected Proof, 1-30, URL

The second AGNOSTIC Paper on the confusion around ESG. This one examines the disagreement of ESG ratings in much more detail and provide some explanations why they are so different…

  • ESG ratings disagree: the average correlation is just 0.54
  • 709 indicators and 64 categories: no wonder that there is disagreement
  • Most disagreement comes from “measurement” and “scope”
  • There is a “rater effect” for ESG ratings

Read the Full Post

AgPa #18: ESG Confusion (1/2)

ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns (2021)
Rajna Gibson Brandon, Philipp Krueger, Peter Steffen Schmidt
Financial Analysts Journal 77(4), 104-127, URL/SSRN

This week’s AGNOSTIC Paper is about a quite controversial topic: Environmental, Social, and Governance a.k.a. ESG. ESG refers to the idea that investors should consider those dimensions in their decisions and thereby contribute to a more sustainable economy. But as this week’s paper shows, there is little agreement on what ESG actually is…

  • ESG ratings disagree: the average correlation is just 0.45
  • There is less ESG disagreement for larger, more profitable firms with credit ratings
  • Investors demanded a risk premium for ESG uncertainty

Read the Full Post

AgPa #17: European Fund Selection

Fund Selection: Sense and Sensibility (2022)
Guido Baltussen, Stan Beckers, Jan Jaap Hazenberg, Willem Van Der Scheer, CFA
Financial Analysts Journal, 78(3), 30-48, URL

Coincidentally, this week’s AGNOSTIC Paper is a pretty good sequel to the last one. The authors study the performance of globally investing mutual fund that were available for European investors between 2008 and 2020. The results are seamlessly consistent with the literature and are anything but a sales-pitch for active fund managers…

  • In aggregate, active managers underperformed the passive alternative
  • Cheap funds with good track records were more likely to outperform

Read the Full Post

AgPa #16: Concentrated Stock Markets (7/7)

Mutual Fund Performance at Long Horizons (2022)
Hendrik Bessembinder, Michael J. Cooper, Feng Zhang
SMU Cox School of Business Research Paper No. 22-11 via SSRN, URL

The seventh and final AGNOSTIC Paper on the extreme concentration in stock markets. This one is an out-of-sample test and documents very similar concentration and positive skewness for US mutual funds between 1991 and 2020.

  • Longer investment-horizons lead to extremer return distributions – also for mutual funds
  • Most active managers underperform passive benchmarks – especially over the long-term
  • Compared to the S&P 500, mutual fund investors lost about $1.3T between 1991 and 2020

But a picture is worth a thousand words…


Read the Full Post

AgPa #15: Concentrated Stock Markets (6/7)

Extreme Stock Market Performers, Part I: Expect Some Drawdowns (2020)
Hendrik Bessembinder
SSRN Working Paper, URL

The sixth of seven AGNOSTIC Papers on the extreme concentration in stock markets. This one shows that even for the top wealth-creators, the road to success has been anything but smooth…

  • Even the best companies during their best decades had substantial drawdowns
  • Today’s drawdowns of tomorrow’s winners are even worse

Read the Full Post

AgPa #14: Concentrated Stock Markets (5/7)

Extreme Stock Market Performers, Part IV: Can Observable Characteristics Forecast Outcomes (2020)
Hendrik Bessembinder
SSRN Working Paper, URL

The fifth of seven AGNOSTIC Papers on the extreme concentration in stock markets. This one will finally examine how to identify the few big winners ex-ante (at least it will try). Future winners have some distinct fundamental characteristics today. That said, the picture remains noisy and it’s very difficult to find them systematically…

  • Future top-performers tend to be younger, produce higher drawdowns, and spend more on R&D
  • Future wealth-creators tend to be older, more levered, and pay higher dividends
  • Identifying big winners remains challenging

Read the Full Post