SA #18: RPV – ‘Pure Value’ Is Indeed More Value Than ‘Value’

RPV: 'Pure Value' Is Indeed More Value Than 'Value'
April 08, 2023

Summary

  • Systematic value investors bet that a diversified portfolio of fundamentally “cheap” stocks should outperform a portfolio of “expensive” stocks over the long term.
  • The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF tracks the S&P 500 Pure Value Index and was incepted in March 2006.
  • Compared to other “smart-beta” value ETFs, RPV is a more aggressive value-strategy and only invests in the top 20% value stocks of the S&P 500 universe (currently 82 positions).
  • With this methodology and three fundamental valuation ratios as value signals, the investment process underlying RPV incorporates several best-practices from the academic literature on the value-factor.
  • RPV is well positioned in a value-peer group and (in my opinion) a very good instrument for investors seeking concentrated exposure to the value-factor.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #17: IUSV – Transparent Value With Modest Active Risk

IUSV: Transparent Value With Modest Active Risk
March 29, 2023

Summary

  • The general idea behind the value factor is that a diversified portfolio of fundamentally cheap stocks should outperform over the long term.
  • Since January 2017, the iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF has tracked the S&P 900 Value Index and provides transparent exposure to the well-researched value premium.
  • S&P uses three well-known fundamental valuation ratios to identify and overweight “cheap” value stocks with respect to the overall market index.
  • Relying on multiple value signals is in line with the research consensus of the literature on the value factor and differentiates IUSV from some competitors.
  • Despite the recent value drawdown, IUSV kept up with a peer group and should be a reasonable instrument for investors who want to have U.S. large-cap value exposure at modest active risk.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #16: IWD – Low Growth Is Not Necessarily Value – Also For Large Caps

IWD: Low Growth Is Not Necessarily Value – Also For Large Caps
March 27, 2023

Summary

  • There are countless methods and nuances of (systematic) value investing, but the general idea remains “cheap beats expensive”. Not always, but on average over the long run.
  • The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index and offers a simple, transparent, and cheap implementation of the value premium for US large caps.
  • The Russell value process unfortunately equates “low sales growth” with “value” which contradicts with the best practices discussed in the literature on the value factor.
  • Despite decent performance when compared to an investable value peer-group, IWD is therefore not my preferred value implementation.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #15: VLUE – Transparent Value With Little Industry Bets

VLUE: Transparent Value With Little Industry Bets
February 28, 2023

Summary

  • The core idea of value investing remains unchanged since its introduction by Graham and Dodd in the 1930s: fundamentally cheap stocks tend to beat expensive stocks on average.
  • The iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF tracks the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index and provides cheap, efficient, and transparent systematic value exposure among US large caps.
  • Importantly, the underlying value index incorporates several insights of the literature on the value factor (multiple value signals, value-rankings within sectors, and no unintended industry bets).
  • For investors who want US value exposure without running into unintended sector bets and without taking too much active risk, VLUE is an interesting instrument.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #14: IWN – Low Growth Is Not Necessarily Value

IWN: Low Growth Is Not Necessarily Value
February 28, 2023

Summary

  • Systematic value investing is the idea that fundamentally cheap stocks tend to outperform expensive stocks over the long term on average.
  • The iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF tracks the Russell 2000 Value Index and offers a simple, transparent, and cheap implementation of the value premium for US small caps.
  • Unfortunately, the index equates “value” with “low sales growth” and therefore contradicts with well-known results of the academic and practitioner literature on the value factor.
  • Despite decent performance since inception in 2000 and over the last years, IWN is therefore not my preferred value instrument.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #13: QVAL – A Close Look At The Methodology

QVAL: A Close Look At The Methodology
February 20, 2023

Summary

  • Value investing is one of the oldest investment styles, and the original idea remains unchanged: cheap stocks tend to outperform expensive stocks on average.
  • Despite weak performance from 2018 until recently, the underlying drivers of the value premium remain still valid and the factor enjoyed a comeback since late 2020.
  • The Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF couldn’t detach itself from the difficult value-period and has massively underperformed the S&P 500 benchmark since its inception in October 2014.
  • QVAL also had problems within the value world. The ETF underperformed two simple academic value benchmarks from Kenneth French’s website, and 7 other well-known value peers.
  • Some of the underperformance could come from the fact that Alpha Architect does not consider more recent academic insights on value investing in some parts of their process.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #12: VOO – Global Revenues And Global Diversification Are Not The Same

VOO: Global Revenues And Global Diversification Are Not The Same
February 07, 2023

Summary

  • In 2017, about 29% of S&P 500 revenues came from overseas. This fraction increased to about 40% by the end of 2022.
  • Some investors argue that this global exposure is a substitute for true international diversification, i.e., that it is not required to invest in non-US stocks.
  • Global revenues certainly help to stabilize the fundamentals and stock prices of the underlying companies, but they are unlikely to save your portfolio from bets on the wrong country/region.
  • A counterexample from European stock markets shows that true global diversification was much better to escape the region’s underperformance than overweighting European companies with a higher share of global revenues.
  • That said, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) remains an outstanding instrument to track the S&P 500 Index. But despite global revenues of the underlying firms, it remains a bet on US large caps.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #11: QMOM – Second-Best In The Momentum Crash of January 2023

QMOM: Second-Best In The Momentum Crash Of January 2023
February 06, 2023

Summary

  • January 2023 was brutal for momentum because many of last year’s losers suddenly outperformed – a momentum crash par excellence.
  • The Dow Jones US Market Neutral Momentum Index, a simple and transparent implementation of the long-short momentum factor, lost 19% YTD (as of February 3, 2023).
  • Most of the losses came from the short-side. The Dow Jones US Low Momentum Index, the portfolio of past losers, returned 25.68% YTD.
  • The Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF returned -0.83% YTD and underperformed the US market by >10% points. Although painful, this is still second-best in a peer-group of other momentum ETFs.
  • This speaks for the differentiated momentum process of Alpha Architect. Nobody likes bad months, but momentum crashes are actually a plausible reason why momentum worked historically and probably continues to do so in the future.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #10: ACWI Vs. VT – Vanguard Wins Again

ACWI Vs. VT: Vanguard Wins Again
January 30, 2023

Summary

  • In this article, I focus on the iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and how it compares to the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
  • For the longest common period since June 2008, ACWI currently lags VT by about 14%-points or 41 basis points per year.
  • The performance gap mostly comes from different underlying indices. VT tracks an index with >9,400 stocks whereas ACWI ignores small caps and “only” holds about 2,800 positions.
  • ACWI is thus farther away from the academic idea of truly passive investing (holding a market-cap weighted portfolio of all investable stocks).
  • ACWI also comes with higher fees (0.32% TER vs. 0.07% for VT). For investors who seek passive exposure to global stock markets, VT therefore seems the better choice.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #9: VT – As Passive As Practically Possible

VT: As Passive As Practically Possible
January 29, 2023

Summary

  • The Vanguard Total World Stock ETF is one of the leading ETFs to invest truly passively in global stock markets.
  • Passive investing means holding the market portfolio. Applied to equities, this is the market-cap weighted portfolio of all available stocks in the world. By definition, this goes beyond the US.
  • Since 2008, the US market has a tracking error of 6.6% compared to VT. The active share currently stands at 41% which makes a pure-US portfolio a quite active strategy.
  • Historically, active bets on the US were well rewarded. But it’s unclear if this pattern continues. The case for passive investing and global diversification is therefore as strong as ever.
  • VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index and holds 9,473 stocks from 49 countries. With just 0.07% TER, it is thus a very efficient instrument for global passive investors.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post