Manager Selection

AgPa #61: Minivans versus Sports Cars

Sensation Seeking and Hedge Funds (2018)
Stephen Brown, Yan Lu, Sugata Ray, Melvyn Teo
The Journal of Finance 73(6), 2871-2914, URL/SSRN

Tell me about the car you drive and I tell you who you are. In the hope of not offending the car enthusiasts too much, this week’s AGNOSTIC Paper relates the performance and characteristics of hedge fund managers to the type of car they drive. As announced in last week’s article, this is a funny example for the important soft factors that investors should consider when selecting an asset manager.

  • Sports car drivers take more risk and deliver lower performance
  • Funds of sports car drivers come with more operational risk
  • Sports-car-driving investors want sports-car-driving fund managers

Read the Full Post

AgPa #60: Some Advice for Asset Manager Selection

Manager Selection, Deselection, and Termination (2020)
Mark Anson
The Journal of Portfolio Management Fund Manager Selection 2020, 46(5), 6-16, URL

After examining the end of the asset manager selection process (i.e. firing decisions) in the last post, this week’s AGNOSTIC Paper provides a broader overview. The author touches a lot of issues and provides some general advice how to cope with them in practice…

  • Asset owners seem to be bad in hiring and firing managers
  • How to decide about firing a manager
  • Style Drift, Style Clustering, and Fees
  • The very important difference between Alpha and Beta
  • Momentum and Crowding

Read the Full Post

AgPa #59: Why and When Institutional Investors Fire Asset Managers

Forbearance in Institutional Investment Management: Evidence from Survey Data (2023)
Amit Goyal, Ramon Tol, Sunil Wahal
Financial Analysts Journal 79(2), 7-20, URL

As we all know, extracting excess returns from (equity) markets is not so easy. Identifying and monitoring managers who can reliably do that is therefore at least as difficult, if not harder. In particular, deciding whether to continue working with a temporary underperforming manager is often difficult. This week‘s paper examines how institutional reports approach this problem in practice…

  • Institutional investors are more patient than thought
  • Tolerance for underperformance is surprisingly long
  • Sophistication and risk-appetite of investors do matter

Read the Full Post

SA #18: RPV – ‘Pure Value’ Is Indeed More Value Than ‘Value’

RPV: 'Pure Value' Is Indeed More Value Than 'Value'
April 08, 2023

Summary

  • Systematic value investors bet that a diversified portfolio of fundamentally “cheap” stocks should outperform a portfolio of “expensive” stocks over the long term.
  • The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF tracks the S&P 500 Pure Value Index and was incepted in March 2006.
  • Compared to other “smart-beta” value ETFs, RPV is a more aggressive value-strategy and only invests in the top 20% value stocks of the S&P 500 universe (currently 82 positions).
  • With this methodology and three fundamental valuation ratios as value signals, the investment process underlying RPV incorporates several best-practices from the academic literature on the value-factor.
  • RPV is well positioned in a value-peer group and (in my opinion) a very good instrument for investors seeking concentrated exposure to the value-factor.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #17: IUSV – Transparent Value With Modest Active Risk

IUSV: Transparent Value With Modest Active Risk
March 29, 2023

Summary

  • The general idea behind the value factor is that a diversified portfolio of fundamentally cheap stocks should outperform over the long term.
  • Since January 2017, the iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF has tracked the S&P 900 Value Index and provides transparent exposure to the well-researched value premium.
  • S&P uses three well-known fundamental valuation ratios to identify and overweight “cheap” value stocks with respect to the overall market index.
  • Relying on multiple value signals is in line with the research consensus of the literature on the value factor and differentiates IUSV from some competitors.
  • Despite the recent value drawdown, IUSV kept up with a peer group and should be a reasonable instrument for investors who want to have U.S. large-cap value exposure at modest active risk.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #16: IWD – Low Growth Is Not Necessarily Value – Also For Large Caps

IWD: Low Growth Is Not Necessarily Value – Also For Large Caps
March 27, 2023

Summary

  • There are countless methods and nuances of (systematic) value investing, but the general idea remains “cheap beats expensive”. Not always, but on average over the long run.
  • The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index and offers a simple, transparent, and cheap implementation of the value premium for US large caps.
  • The Russell value process unfortunately equates “low sales growth” with “value” which contradicts with the best practices discussed in the literature on the value factor.
  • Despite decent performance when compared to an investable value peer-group, IWD is therefore not my preferred value implementation.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #15: VLUE – Transparent Value With Little Industry Bets

VLUE: Transparent Value With Little Industry Bets
February 28, 2023

Summary

  • The core idea of value investing remains unchanged since its introduction by Graham and Dodd in the 1930s: fundamentally cheap stocks tend to beat expensive stocks on average.
  • The iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF tracks the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index and provides cheap, efficient, and transparent systematic value exposure among US large caps.
  • Importantly, the underlying value index incorporates several insights of the literature on the value factor (multiple value signals, value-rankings within sectors, and no unintended industry bets).
  • For investors who want US value exposure without running into unintended sector bets and without taking too much active risk, VLUE is an interesting instrument.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #14: IWN – Low Growth Is Not Necessarily Value

IWN: Low Growth Is Not Necessarily Value
February 28, 2023

Summary

  • Systematic value investing is the idea that fundamentally cheap stocks tend to outperform expensive stocks over the long term on average.
  • The iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF tracks the Russell 2000 Value Index and offers a simple, transparent, and cheap implementation of the value premium for US small caps.
  • Unfortunately, the index equates “value” with “low sales growth” and therefore contradicts with well-known results of the academic and practitioner literature on the value factor.
  • Despite decent performance since inception in 2000 and over the last years, IWN is therefore not my preferred value instrument.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #13: QVAL – A Close Look At The Methodology

QVAL: A Close Look At The Methodology
February 20, 2023

Summary

  • Value investing is one of the oldest investment styles, and the original idea remains unchanged: cheap stocks tend to outperform expensive stocks on average.
  • Despite weak performance from 2018 until recently, the underlying drivers of the value premium remain still valid and the factor enjoyed a comeback since late 2020.
  • The Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF couldn’t detach itself from the difficult value-period and has massively underperformed the S&P 500 benchmark since its inception in October 2014.
  • QVAL also had problems within the value world. The ETF underperformed two simple academic value benchmarks from Kenneth French’s website, and 7 other well-known value peers.
  • Some of the underperformance could come from the fact that Alpha Architect does not consider more recent academic insights on value investing in some parts of their process.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post

SA #11: QMOM – Second-Best In The Momentum Crash of January 2023

QMOM: Second-Best In The Momentum Crash Of January 2023
February 06, 2023

Summary

  • January 2023 was brutal for momentum because many of last year’s losers suddenly outperformed – a momentum crash par excellence.
  • The Dow Jones US Market Neutral Momentum Index, a simple and transparent implementation of the long-short momentum factor, lost 19% YTD (as of February 3, 2023).
  • Most of the losses came from the short-side. The Dow Jones US Low Momentum Index, the portfolio of past losers, returned 25.68% YTD.
  • The Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF returned -0.83% YTD and underperformed the US market by >10% points. Although painful, this is still second-best in a peer-group of other momentum ETFs.
  • This speaks for the differentiated momentum process of Alpha Architect. Nobody likes bad months, but momentum crashes are actually a plausible reason why momentum worked historically and probably continues to do so in the future.


Read the Full Article on Seeking Alpha

Read the Full Post